Managing your R&D Tax Incentive risk - checklist
aUDITS ON THE r&d INCENTIVE HAS BEEN STEADILY INCREASING
With ATO and AusIndustry audits on the increase in the R&D Incentive space, claimants and their tax advisors are facing additional rigour and controls. Where an R&D claim is outsourced to a 'specialist' R&D Tax consultant, many claimants are not fully aware of the regulatory conditions and their own obligations.
Whilst the realisation of an immediate refund or tax rebate provides a positive short term result, in the long term companies face the very real risk of having entire claims dismissed and needing to refund the benefit, with interest, and potentially penalties applicable.
Here is a checklist to sense check that your R&D risk is appropriately managed:
X - USING A REGISTERED R&D TAX PRACTITIONER
If you are using a specialist R&D Tax consultant, make sure they are a registered R&D tax practitioner with the Taxation Practitioners Board (TPB). This is a mandatory requirement with any person not registered in breach of the law and clients left exposed to significant risk. Check the R&D Application for appropriate disclosure and with your consultant.
X - HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGAGEMENT LETTER
An engagement letter should be present between you and your R&D Tax consultant. It is important to understand the scope of services being provided and evidence of using a registered R&D tax practitioner can help to mitigate penalties.
X - AUDIT ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED AT NO COST
Ideally, an engagement should provide audit assistance at no cost. As the program is self assessment, specialist R&D Tax consultants should stand by the work they have undertaken. This also incentivises high quality work with a focus on reducing the risk of an audit.
X - R&D TAX PRACTITIONER HAS DOMAIN SPECIFIC EXPERTISE
Your R&D Tax consultant should understand the nature of the scientific/technical activities undertaken and should document your R&D position, rather than asking you to document this. Insufficient understanding of the scientific/technical activities means activities may not be appropriately identified, or adequately documented, increasing the risk of an audit.
X - SUFFICIENT DETAIL IN THE AUSINDUSTRY R&D REGISTRATION FORM
Sufficient detail in the AusIndustry R&D Registration Form is required to enable an assessor to conclude that R&D activities have been undertaken, minimising audit risk. Have you clearly documented a knowledge gap, and the steps involving a falsifiable hypothesis, testing, results and observations towards developing new knowledge?
X - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS PRESENT, INCLUDING RECORDS OF EXPERIMENTATION, AND EVIDENCE OF TIME/EFFORT SPENT ON R&D ACTIVITIES
Do you have adequate substantiating documentation that links/evidences the R&D activities claimed and expenditure incurred? This is a key audit focus/risk area. This should be in a centralised location and easily accessible in the event of an audit. Please see our separate blog post on this here.
X - ADEQUATE EXPERTISE IN R&D TAX INCENTIVE SCHEME REQUIREMENTS
Have you been asked about your 'aggregated turnover' (group revenue), which is calculated on a group basis and determines the rate of R&D Tax Offset and refundability? A common mistake is considering the revenue of the claimant entity in isolation.
Are you using a simplified approach to defining R&D activities, making whole of project claims? This is a high risk area that AusIndustry and the ATO are focusing on.
Do you have a number of support R&D activities in the AusIndustry R&D Registration Form? AusIndustry has stated that every project should have at least one. Projects without this will present a high likelihood of audit.
Are you claiming for overseas R&D activities without pre-approval from AusIndustry? Minor or incidental amounts informing the R&D activities (e.g. conference travel) are acceptable, however, claiming for a number of R&D activities which have been conducted overseas is not.
IF YOU ARE CONCERNED THAT YOUR R&D CLAIM OR ASSOCIATED RECORD KEEPING MAY NOT BE UP TO SCRATCH, CONTACT US TODAY FOR A NO OBLIGATION DISCUSSION.